Monthly Archives: August 2013

Schools Don’t Need to Be Creativity Killers

Though genetic attributes contribute to differences in intellectual capacity among individuals, all humans are born with the ability to engage in creative thought and action.  Whether or not individuals use and develop that ability, how they use it, and how well they use it all depend on what they have learned from their environment, parents, teachers, peers, and culture.  Through the observation of young children, it is plain to see that humans possess a natural curiosity and tendency towards creative problem-solving.  With or without encouragement from parents, children exhibit vivid imaginations and are frequently making connections between concepts in novel ways.  As children get older, they become more exposed to the attitudes and dispositions of their caregivers.  Adults who seek to foster creativity can positively influence a child’s exercise of creative capabilities.  Those whose attitudes tend to discourage creativity, because of individual prejudices, cultural traits, or institutional constraints, can stifle those same capabilities.  Most often, it seems to be the school setting which plays a significant role in developing or impeding creativity.  So, how can we make sure that we, as educators, are not contributing to the killing of our children’s creativity?

creativity, kids

set us free!

creativity, kids

set us free!

creativity, kids

set us free!


Creativity expert Robert Harris tells us that the successful use of creative abilities relies on the development of certain creative dispositions and attitudes.  These include:

  • Openness to change
  • Willingness to play with possibilities
  • Unwillingness to blindly accept the status quo
  • Relentless curiosity
  • Desire and motivation to work hard to improve the ways thing are

We need to examine our school learning environments to determine whether we are unknowingly erecting obstacles to the development of these attitudes.  If schools or educators demand conformity, sap confidence by creating a culture of fear of low test scores, or restrict student curiosity and experimentation with confining schedules and physical space, then they are taking from our children a key element of what it means to be human and slowly starving it death.  However, if teachers make a concerted effort to begin feeding their own creative selves, they can begin to create a school atmosphere that satiates the voracious creative appetite our students naturally bring to the table.  If teachers believe in their students’ capacity to create, they will.  If they are willing to make and admit to mistakes, their students will too.  If they tolerate and encourage different perspectives, answers, and questions, their students will take discussions places they have never been.  If they say “What if?” or “Why not?” instead of “That won’t work” or “Stop being silly”; if they reward great questions as much or more than right answers; if they ask open-ended questions rather than ‘googleable’ ones…if they do all of these things, their students will be free to exercise the creative talents they possess in ways that will amaze us all.

Wonderfully innovative ideas do not come as a bolt from out of the blue as popular culture would sometimes have us believe.  They require hard work, persistence, a willingness to take risks, and, perhaps most of all, an environment in which the creative attitude can survive and thrive.  Why would we intentionally create a learning institution without such an environment?  If we are truly concerned with preparing students for a life beyond school that demands creative thinkers, we had better begin to recognize the changes required in our schools and our teaching.

What if we weren’t the creativity killing school most of us went to as students?   Just imagine.

Sir Ken Robinson, one of our most influential thought leaders on education and creativity, on this very subject circa 2007.



In Todd Rose’s compelling TEDtalk on the Myth of Average (see below), he tells us that “desks are the cockpits of our economy”.  This is a provocative statement which sums up the analogy he makes between fighter jet cockpits and desks in schools.  Rose explains that the Air Force, after years of poor performance, finally came to the realization that a one-size-fits-all cockpit simply did not work.  Faced with such a wide range of body types, engineers had always designed cockpits to the average size profile.  What they learned through extensive research was that this average pilot did not exist, so the cockpits were really one-size-fits-none.  From that time forward they engineered cockpits to the outer edges of the range and added the ability to adjust where needed, thereby giving each individual pilot an opportunity to find the comfort and access needed for success.  Rose has adeptly made the connection between cockpits and student desks.  If we understand that every student is different, with different strengths and weaknesses, different styles of learning, different rates of maturation and development, then why do we think that a one-size-fits-all education works?  If we design our textbooks, curriculum, learning spaces, even our desks to the average student, do we end up really designing for nobody?

classroom learning environment

designed for nobody

I am consumed with exploring questions such as these and opening up the conversation with educators around the world.  In the last few years, I have seen a shift towards the understanding that education needs to be as customizable as possible and that successful independent schools need to provide diverse opportunities designed to prepare students for future challenges that no longer lie within a predictable range.  This shift has been driven by a pledge to know, challenge, and love every student and has been furthered by strong commitment to faculty professional development and facility upgrades.

The school I work at has invested a good deal of money and energy this year into the development of more flexible learning spaces.  Desks have been removed from a middle school computer lab and replaced by a series of tables that can be arranged in a variety of formations suitable for a wide range of activity.  Everything from small group work to boardroom presentations can be easily accommodated, thereby creating a space for both student and teacher collaboration that lends itself well to project work.  More informal spaces complete with comfortable couches that can be used for group discussions and socializing have been added, while plans in the library include the possibility of mobile bookshelves for customizable and shareable learning space.

In first grade classrooms, desks were replaced by fold-able work tables on wheels.  Every day the students themselves will have the power to decide how they are most comfortable and thus ready to learn.  Need more organized workspace?  Leave the tables up.  Prefer to work on the floor?  Fold the tables, push them to the side and have all the real estate required.  In a traditional school building, minor changes such as these are certainly steps in the right direction.  Without actually knocking down walls, we are working to move past the old notions of classroom learning and encouraging teachers to allow students more freedom to move around.

In Sweden they have taken this concept and run with it.  Wishful thinking for most of us…Check it out here.

Learning takes place in many different ways.  Gone are the days when a quiet room of students seated in rows of desks is the ideal learning environment.  While that type of environment can be appropriate at times, what we have learned from Todd Rose, other thought leaders in education, and from our own experience is that an adaptive, flexible learning environment with multiple spaces and configurations is paramount to the development of student creativity and achievement.  By moving out of a one-size-fits-all mindset, we will be providing the opportunity to succeed to all students.  After all, if desks are the cockpit of our economy, than it is imperative for our future that we be sure to make those desks adjustable.

Todd Rose was not really just talking about furniture in his talk.  He was making a call to our education system to stop designing all activities, materials, and spaces to the average.  If we listen to him, we can begin to free students from the constraints traditional schools have placed on them and we can give all students an opportunity to continue to love learning.

it's about learning

exploring the educational crossroads of our time

The Principal of Change

Stories of learning and leading


Pondering education, technology, and making a difference

Leading is Learning.

The Santa Fe Leadership Center's Incubator for Teaching and Learning

Granted, and...

thoughts on education by Grant Wiggins

The Randolph Journey

Life in a K-12 community of learners


Thoughts on How Innovative School Learning Environments Can Better Prepare Students to Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century


Thoughts on How Innovative School Learning Environments Can Better Prepare Students to Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century

Lisa Nielsen: The Innovative Educator

Thoughts on How Innovative School Learning Environments Can Better Prepare Students to Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century

My Island View

Educational, Disconnected Utterances

Will Richardson

Will Richardson

%d bloggers like this: